October 20

Today there are few stars and more artistes Diljit

first_imgMumbai: Actor-singer Diljit Dosanjh says with new talents emerging everyday across platforms, the mechanics of the industry has completely changed, with star system giving way to artistes. Diljit says today the definition of a “star” has changed. “Back home, no one looks at me as a star. At least I know my mother doesn’t. I don’t about others. But I think there’s nothing like a ‘star’ anymore. People will like you as an artiste, they’ll respect you for that and not just because you’re a star. Also Read – Rihanna to release 500-page ‘visual’ autobiography “There are very few stars today, there are more artistes. Which is very good,” Diljit told PTI. The actor, who made his Bollywood debut with “Udta Punjab”, says social media has given access and voice to many good singers and actors. “They make even short videos with all seriousness. It makes you realise that you’re working and you’ve got an opportunity but isn’t because you’re the best. “Whatever God has given me, I feel blessed but I don’t take it for granted. There are much better looking, more talented people, sometimes one gets an opportunity and that’s all luck,” he says. Also Read – Hilarie Burton, Jeffery Dean Morgan tie the knot Though there is a constant influx of new talents in the industry–or on the Internet–the 35-year-old actor says it doesn’t cause insecurity. “If you’re getting way too much than perhaps what you deserve, there’s no insecurity. It comes up when you feel ‘I expect and deserve much more but I’m not getting it.'” Opportunity is a key which describes Punjabi artistes ability to multitask. Most of them write, sing, act and produce their own content. “That’s because when there are less opportunities, one does everything on their own. Of course, no doubt there is talent in North. Today if there’s an individual music scene, it’s only in Punjab. Even in Hindi films we have Punjabi songs. “We had heard ‘Kaala Chashma’ long back, it comes to Bollywood and becomes a hit again. Everyone benefits. Hindi has a massive reach. So singers get a platform as well. Both parties are happy,” the actor says. Diljit will be next seen in the spoof-comedy “Arjun Patiala”, featuring Kriti Sanon and Varun Sharma. In the film, directed by Rohit Jugraj, Diljit is playing a quirky small town cop. For the actor, who has done several hit comedies in Punjab, the genre is never easy. “I never approach comedy thinking ‘I know it all.’ Comedy is tough. To make people laugh is not easy. Written material, the story and situation matter a lot. In Punjabi films I do give me inputs. In Hindi not really. “I don’t have that much control in Hindi language, in Punjabi I can say a particular dialogue will sound funnier if we tweak it. In Hindi I just follow.” The actor says he was bowled over the script at the narration stage itself. “I’ve never done a comedy in this space. I thought I should give it a try. Maddock has made some fantastic films too. All it takes is two minutes for me to say yes or no to a script. I had to do this one the moment I heard it.” Written by Ritesh Shah and Sandeep Leyzell, “Arjun Patiala” is scheduled to release on July 26.last_img read more

September 25

Intelligence sharing with the US will be harmed if UK uses Huawei

A Huawei store is seen in the terminal building of the new Beijing Daxing International Airport in Beijing. July 9, 2019.  If Britain allows Huawei to build Britain’s 5G network, the intelligence sharing relationship with the US will be harmed, the former US Secretary of Homeland Security has warned.Governor Tom Ridge, who set up the US security department in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, said the western world is in a “digital war” with Beijing. He called on the incoming UK administration to review as a priority the decision to allow Chinese telecoms giant Huawei access to Britain’s critical national infrastructure. Speaking in London of the risks to the close intelligence relationship between the UK and the US, he said: “It’s a complication. Much of the intelligence sharing is electronic and if you are relying on secure telecoms and they’ve got a front door, well I don’t know how many pigeons can fly across the Atlantic.“It will affect intelligence sharing.” Governor Ridge, a Vietnam veteran, said the opaque nature of the relationship between Huawei and the Chinese Ministry of State Security meant the UK would be offering China a “front door” into the telecoms system, with no need for “back door software bugs”. “Everyone’s excited by 5G but along with the promise of 5G there’s peril,” he said. Aerial view of data storage center for Huawei at the Guian New Area in Guiyang, Guizhou Province of China. The first phase of construction covers an area of 400,000 square meters, which will operate about 600,000 servers to store Huawei’s management data from 170 countries. May 14, 2019.Credit:Visual China Group A Huawei store is seen in the terminal building of the new Beijing Daxing International Airport in Beijing. July 9, 2019. Credit:GREG BAKER/AFP “Don’t make a final decision until you sit down with our President and decide what is in our collective best interest.“The employees of Huawei are pretty much public employees even though they’ve got Huawei t-shirts on.“We’ve been through so much together historically that it would be foolish for us not to sit down as friends and allies and challenge each other. In the long term I think everybody would be on the same page.” Huawei – also known as Huawei Technologies, Inc. – is owned 100 per cent by Huawei Investment & Holding, a much smaller company with only a few hundred employees. This holding company is in turn co-owned by founder Ren Zhengfei, with nearly 1.01 per cent and a state-operated trade union, called Huawei Investment & Holding Company Trade Union Committee, with the remaining 98.99 per cent. The trade union officials are appointed by, and paid salaries from, the Chinese government. “If I were to look for the smoking gun of how the party influences Huawei’s leadership, I would look at the trade unions,” said Dr John Hemmings, a China expert at the Henry Jackson Society.Dr Hemmings feared there has been no rational policy-making in the UK and that cost had been a major factor in pushing security aside. “The telecoms companies have run policy and the government has tried to keep up,” he said. He was surprised that Britain was the only member of the 5-Eyes intelligence partnership of the UK, US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, that had assessed the risks from Chinese involvement in 5G networks as manageable. He cited the example of Huawei’s installation of the cyber network in the African Union (AU)  headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in 2003. After a few months it was noted how Chinese trade envoys were surprisingly well informed of the AU negotiators’ positions and that the cyber network was most active between midnight and 3am, long after staff had left. A subsequent sweep for electronic bugs by a French security company showed a number of software vulnerabilities that had been sending data secretly back to Beijing. Governor Ridge called for spies from GCHQ, the US equivalent, the National Security Agency and cyber experts from Australia and New Zealand to meet urgently to review all the intelligence relating to Huawei. “The most important thing to do is to get the critical people in the 5-Eyes together instead of long distance, and challenge each other,” Governor Ridge said.“There’s nothing wrong with having two competitive analyses, but you do have to try to harmonise and rationalise it.  Aerial view of data storage center for Huawei at the Guian New Area in Guiyang, Guizhou Province of China. The first phase of construction covers an area of 400,000 square meters, which will operate about 600,000 servers to store Huawei's management data from 170 countries. May 14, 2019. A parliamentary study in 2013 by Sir Malcolm Rifkind was warned by MI5 that China may try to exploit vulnerabilities in Huawei’s equipment in order to gain access to the BT network in the UK, “which would provide them with an attractive espionage opportunity”. A recent study on Huawei code by Finite State, a cyber security firm, found on average, Huawei devices had 102 known vulnerabilities inside their firmware, primarily due to the use of “vulnerable open-source and third-party components”. In virtually all categories studied, Huawei devices were found to be less secure than comparable devices from other vendors.Huawei responded to the Finite State report refuting the allegations. Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily  Front Page newsletter and new  audio briefings. read more